EHL10 01: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus KOU
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „<div style="color:grey">Im folgenden werden alle Zitate aufgelistet, die aus der Quelle [EHL10] stammen. Sie sind nach den Seitenthemen, in …“
 
 
(10 dazwischenliegende Versionen desselben Benutzers werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
<div style="color:grey">Im folgenden werden alle Zitate aufgelistet, die aus der Quelle [[quellen#ehl10|[EHL10] ]] stammen. Sie sind nach den Seitenthemen, in denen sie vorkommen, gegliedert.</div>
<div style="color:grey">Im folgenden werden alle Zitate aufgelistet, die aus der Quelle [[quellen#ehl10_01|[EHL10_01] ]] stammen. Sie sind nach den Seitenthemen, in denen sie vorkommen, gegliedert.</div>


==[[ E-Learning]]==
==[[E-Learning]] : Web 2.0 und Kompetenzentwicklungsprozesse ==


* More and more educational scenarios or ''landscapes'' are developed utilizing Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and e-portfolios. Web 2.0 tools give learners much more control, through enabling learners easily to access, modify, or develop their own digital learning materials; and web 2.0 tools enable social learning networks that transcend the bounds of an individual class of students, thus blurring the distinction between formal and informal learning. [[quellen#ehl10|[EHL10, Foreword, pg. v]]]
* The question of the emotional labilization is, in my point of view, also the leading question when designing e-Learning that furthers competences. <br>Regarding the new instruments, methods, and processes of Web 2.0, it is possible to ask which potential they have to spark further and accompany true changes and development of competences when exhausting all possibilities. (...)<br>The following Table 22.1 briefly explains the instruments and methods and lists the optimal potential for labilization (...), as relating to personal (P), activity-related (A), subject-specific-methodological (S), and socio-communicative (SC) competences. A high degree of labilization concerning P means, for example, that this instrument can be used very effectively for the development of personal competence in e-Learning (Erpenbeck and Sauter 2007). [[quellen#ehl10_01|[EHL10_01, pg. 309]]]
<gallery style="margin-left:20px;">
      Datei:Ehl10 01 s310.png|aus [EHL10_01, pg. 310]
      Datei:Ehl10 01 s311.png|aus [EHL10_01, pg. 311]
      Datei:Ehl10 01 s312.png|aus [EHL10_01, pg. 312]
</gallery>
 
==[[Inklusionsmodell]]==
===Allgemeines===
 
* (...) conveying competences needs different forms of learning and teaching than conveying knowledge. The question of the acquisition (interiorization) of rules, assessments, and results of assessments (= values) and norms in the form of the learners' own emotions and motivations is central. Becoming emotionally labilized is pivotal to this appropriation. Emotional labilization also provides a criterion for assessing the effectiveness of Web 2.0 instruments for developing competences. [[quellen#ehl10_01|[EHL10_01, S. 299]]]
 
=== Bestandteile des Modells ===
 
* Knowledge alone is impotence. It is competence that enables someone to act. Emotional labilization secures the stability of competence development. [[quellen#ehl10_01|[EHL10_01, pg. 312]]]
 
===Werte, Regeln und Normen ===
 
* (...) it is apparent that abilities, informational knowledge, and qualifications are indispensable foundations for competence development, but are not competences themselves. Competences are actually constituted by interiorized rules, values (validation), and norms: that is, rules, values (validation), and norms transformed into one's own emotions and motivations. The process of interorization, however, is much more difficult to control, more open in its results, and basically entirely different in its makeup than the simple passing on of knowledge. [[quellen#ehl10_01|[EHL10_01, pg. 306-307]]]

Aktuelle Version vom 23. Mai 2012, 08:01 Uhr

Im folgenden werden alle Zitate aufgelistet, die aus der Quelle [EHL10_01] stammen. Sie sind nach den Seitenthemen, in denen sie vorkommen, gegliedert.

E-Learning : Web 2.0 und Kompetenzentwicklungsprozesse

  • The question of the emotional labilization is, in my point of view, also the leading question when designing e-Learning that furthers competences.
    Regarding the new instruments, methods, and processes of Web 2.0, it is possible to ask which potential they have to spark further and accompany true changes and development of competences when exhausting all possibilities. (...)
    The following Table 22.1 briefly explains the instruments and methods and lists the optimal potential for labilization (...), as relating to personal (P), activity-related (A), subject-specific-methodological (S), and socio-communicative (SC) competences. A high degree of labilization concerning P means, for example, that this instrument can be used very effectively for the development of personal competence in e-Learning (Erpenbeck and Sauter 2007). [EHL10_01, pg. 309]

Allgemeines

  • (...) conveying competences needs different forms of learning and teaching than conveying knowledge. The question of the acquisition (interiorization) of rules, assessments, and results of assessments (= values) and norms in the form of the learners' own emotions and motivations is central. Becoming emotionally labilized is pivotal to this appropriation. Emotional labilization also provides a criterion for assessing the effectiveness of Web 2.0 instruments for developing competences. [EHL10_01, S. 299]

Bestandteile des Modells

  • Knowledge alone is impotence. It is competence that enables someone to act. Emotional labilization secures the stability of competence development. [EHL10_01, pg. 312]

Werte, Regeln und Normen

  • (...) it is apparent that abilities, informational knowledge, and qualifications are indispensable foundations for competence development, but are not competences themselves. Competences are actually constituted by interiorized rules, values (validation), and norms: that is, rules, values (validation), and norms transformed into one's own emotions and motivations. The process of interorization, however, is much more difficult to control, more open in its results, and basically entirely different in its makeup than the simple passing on of knowledge. [EHL10_01, pg. 306-307]